Recommended Reading: Poynter’s Roundup Of 2014′s Most Notable Errors And Corrections
You probably won’t be surprised to hear that Poynter’s Craig Silverman has put Rolling Stone ’s “campus rape” report atop his list of 2014′s biggest mistakes by the media.
“It should go down as one of the most cautionary tales of confirmation bias in journalism,” he writes of the magazine’s “campus rape” report.
Silverman details how Rolling Stone compounded the problem:
“Managing editor Will Dana published ‘A Note to Our Readers’ that acknowledged there were now ‘discrepancies’ in the account of Jackie, the woman who was allegedly assaulted. The first version of that letter also blamed her, saying that the magazine now realized its trust in her had been ‘misplaced.’ After objections, the magazine removed that line — and didn’t acknowledge the after-the-fact scrubbing. It also has not offered any real information about how the story was fact checked, where mistakes were made, and what it plans to do about it. It hunkered down and kept silent. Shameful.”
NPR’s position on errors and corrections: “We have a simple standard: Errors of fact do not stand uncorrected. If we get it wrong, we’ll admit it.”
The “How We Make Corrections” memo, which everyone has surely bookmarked, is here.
If you want to reread the note on “A Common Corrections Scenario,” it’s here.
Also, go here to see all our corrections. It pays to read through them once in a while, to learn from our mistakes and to see the way we craft our corrections.
For even more on the errors we make, see this note from last month: “We Get So Many Things Right; Why Do We Get Some Things Wrong?”
Back to Poynter’s list. We’re on it.
Thankfully, NPR shows up because of one of our more amusing corrections in 2014:
“An earlier version of this story said that the methane emissions associated with livestock come from their farts. In fact, most of those methane emissions come from belches.”
With that, I’ll stop gassing on about corrections.
(Memmos; Dec. 18, 2014)
December 18, 2014